MozartV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000187

Nutritional evaluation of peas for ducks

Identifieur interne : 000187 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000186; suivant : 000188

Nutritional evaluation of peas for ducks

Auteurs : Charles M. Nyachoti ; Edward M. Onyango ; Olufemi F. Omogbenigun ; Olayiwola Adeola

Source :

Journal of the science of food and agriculture [ 0022-5142 ] ; 2004.

RBID : Pascal:04-0343075

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Valeur nutritive, Pois, Pisum sativum, Energie, Digestibilité.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Digestibility, Energy, Nutritive value, Pea, Pisum sativum.

Abstract

The nutritive value of four pea cultivars (AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma) and soybean meal (SBM) was evaluated in a 102 h study with 48 male White Pekin ducks. All birds were tube-fed 25 g of dextrose at 24 and 30 h after feed withdrawal, then 25 g of each feedstuff was tube-fed to eight ducks at 48 and 54 h after feed withdrawal. Excreta were quantitatively collected during the next 54 h. Endogenous nitrogen, amino acids and energy per bird in the 54 h collection period were 1.06 ± 0.58 g, 0.047 ± 0.025 g and 0.098 ± 0.049 MJ respectively. There were differences (P < 0.05) in apparent amino acid digestibilities (AAAD) and true amino acid digestibilities (TAAD). On average, AAAD were 82.8, 82.0, 70.3, 82.4 and 77.7% and TAAD were 89.4, 89.2, 82.3, 89.5 and 85.3% for SBM, AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma respectively. The nitrogen-corrected apparent and true metabolisable energy values did not differ among the pea diets and were 13.36 ± 0.071 and 14.59 ± 0.071 MJ kg^-1 respectively. Respective values for SBM were 12.16 ± 0.16 and 13.39 ± 0.16 MJ kg^-1 and both were lower (P < 0.05) than in peas.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0022-5142`
A02	`01`			`@0 JSFAAE`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. sci. food agric.`
A05				`@2 84`
A06				`@2 5`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Nutritional evaluation of peas for ducks`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 NYACHOTI (Charles M.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 ONYANGO (Edward M.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 OMOGBENIGUN (Olufemi F.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 ADEOLA (Olayiwola)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba @2 Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2 @3 CAN @Z 1 aut. @Z 3 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Department of Animal Science, Purdue University @2 West Lafayette, IN 47907 @3 USA @Z 2 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A20				`@1 474-480`
A21				`@1 2004`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 2634 @5 354000116684990140`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2004 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 33 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 04-0343075`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of the science of food and agriculture`
A66	`01`			`@0 GBR`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 The nutritive value of four pea cultivars (AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma) and soybean meal (SBM) was evaluated in a 102 h study with 48 male White Pekin ducks. All birds were tube-fed 25 g of dextrose at 24 and 30 h after feed withdrawal, then 25 g of each feedstuff was tube-fed to eight ducks at 48 and 54 h after feed withdrawal. Excreta were quantitatively collected during the next 54 h. Endogenous nitrogen, amino acids and energy per bird in the 54 h collection period were 1.06 ± 0.58 g, 0.047 ± 0.025 g and 0.098 ± 0.049 MJ respectively. There were differences (P < 0.05) in apparent amino acid digestibilities (AAAD) and true amino acid digestibilities (TAAD). On average, AAAD were 82.8, 82.0, 70.3, 82.4 and 77.7% and TAAD were 89.4, 89.2, 82.3, 89.5 and 85.3% for SBM, AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma respectively. The nitrogen-corrected apparent and true metabolisable energy values did not differ among the pea diets and were 13.36 ± 0.071 and 14.59 ± 0.071 MJ kg^-1 respectively. Respective values for SBM were 12.16 ± 0.16 and 13.39 ± 0.16 MJ kg^-1 and both were lower (P < 0.05) than in peas.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002A35A06`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 002A16E`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Valeur nutritive @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Nutritive value @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Valor nutritivo @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pois @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Pea @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Guisante @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pisum sativum @2 NS @5 10`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Pisum sativum @2 NS @5 10`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Pisum sativum @2 NS @5 10`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Energie @5 19`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Energy @5 19`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Energía @5 19`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Digestibilité @5 20`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Digestibility @5 20`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Digestibilidad @5 20`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Légume @5 08`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Vegetables @5 08`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hortalizas @5 08`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Leguminosae @2 NS`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Leguminosae @2 NS`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Leguminosae @2 NS`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dicotyledones @2 NS`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dicotyledones @2 NS`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Dicotyledones @2 NS`
C07	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Angiospermae @2 NS`
C07	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Angiospermae @2 NS`
C07	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Angiospermae @2 NS`
C07	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Spermatophyta @2 NS`
C07	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Spermatophyta @2 NS`
C07	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Spermatophyta @2 NS`
C07	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Légumineuse grain @5 49`
C07	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Grain legume @5 49`
C07	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Leguminosa grano @5 49`
N21				`@1 201`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 04-0343075 INIST
ET :	Nutritional evaluation of peas for ducks
AU :	NYACHOTI (Charles M.); ONYANGO (Edward M.); OMOGBENIGUN (Olufemi F.); ADEOLA (Olayiwola)
AF :	Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba/Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2/Canada (1 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Animal Science, Purdue University/West Lafayette, IN 47907/Etats-Unis (2 aut., 4 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of the science of food and agriculture; ISSN 0022-5142; Coden JSFAAE; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2004; Vol. 84; No. 5; Pp. 474-480; Bibl. 33 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	The nutritive value of four pea cultivars (AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma) and soybean meal (SBM) was evaluated in a 102 h study with 48 male White Pekin ducks. All birds were tube-fed 25 g of dextrose at 24 and 30 h after feed withdrawal, then 25 g of each feedstuff was tube-fed to eight ducks at 48 and 54 h after feed withdrawal. Excreta were quantitatively collected during the next 54 h. Endogenous nitrogen, amino acids and energy per bird in the 54 h collection period were 1.06 ± 0.58 g, 0.047 ± 0.025 g and 0.098 ± 0.049 MJ respectively. There were differences (P < 0.05) in apparent amino acid digestibilities (AAAD) and true amino acid digestibilities (TAAD). On average, AAAD were 82.8, 82.0, 70.3, 82.4 and 77.7% and TAAD were 89.4, 89.2, 82.3, 89.5 and 85.3% for SBM, AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma respectively. The nitrogen-corrected apparent and true metabolisable energy values did not differ among the pea diets and were 13.36 ± 0.071 and 14.59 ± 0.071 MJ kg^-1 respectively. Respective values for SBM were 12.16 ± 0.16 and 13.39 ± 0.16 MJ kg^-1 and both were lower (P < 0.05) than in peas.
CC :	002A35A06; 002A16E
FD :	Valeur nutritive; Pois; Pisum sativum; Energie; Digestibilité
FG :	Légume; Leguminosae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Légumineuse grain
ED :	Nutritive value; Pea; Pisum sativum; Energy; Digestibility
EG :	Vegetables; Leguminosae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Grain legume
SD :	Valor nutritivo; Guisante; Pisum sativum; Energía; Digestibilidad
LO :	INIST-2634.354000116684990140
ID :	04-0343075

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:04-0343075

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Nutritional evaluation of peas for ducks</title>
<author><name sortKey="Nyachoti, Charles M" sort="Nyachoti, Charles M" uniqKey="Nyachoti C" first="Charles M." last="Nyachoti">Charles M. Nyachoti</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba</s1>
<s2>Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Onyango, Edward M" sort="Onyango, Edward M" uniqKey="Onyango E" first="Edward M." last="Onyango">Edward M. Onyango</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Animal Science, Purdue University</s1>
<s2>West Lafayette, IN 47907</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Omogbenigun, Olufemi F" sort="Omogbenigun, Olufemi F" uniqKey="Omogbenigun O" first="Olufemi F." last="Omogbenigun">Olufemi F. Omogbenigun</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba</s1>
<s2>Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Adeola, Olayiwola" sort="Adeola, Olayiwola" uniqKey="Adeola O" first="Olayiwola" last="Adeola">Olayiwola Adeola</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Animal Science, Purdue University</s1>
<s2>West Lafayette, IN 47907</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">04-0343075</idno>
<date when="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 04-0343075 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:04-0343075</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000187</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Nutritional evaluation of peas for ducks</title>
<author><name sortKey="Nyachoti, Charles M" sort="Nyachoti, Charles M" uniqKey="Nyachoti C" first="Charles M." last="Nyachoti">Charles M. Nyachoti</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba</s1>
<s2>Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Onyango, Edward M" sort="Onyango, Edward M" uniqKey="Onyango E" first="Edward M." last="Onyango">Edward M. Onyango</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Animal Science, Purdue University</s1>
<s2>West Lafayette, IN 47907</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Omogbenigun, Olufemi F" sort="Omogbenigun, Olufemi F" uniqKey="Omogbenigun O" first="Olufemi F." last="Omogbenigun">Olufemi F. Omogbenigun</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba</s1>
<s2>Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Adeola, Olayiwola" sort="Adeola, Olayiwola" uniqKey="Adeola O" first="Olayiwola" last="Adeola">Olayiwola Adeola</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Animal Science, Purdue University</s1>
<s2>West Lafayette, IN 47907</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of the science of food and agriculture</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. sci. food agric.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-5142</idno>
<imprint><date when="2004">2004</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of the science of food and agriculture</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. sci. food agric.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-5142</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Digestibility</term>
<term>Energy</term>
<term>Nutritive value</term>
<term>Pea</term>
<term>Pisum sativum</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Valeur nutritive</term>
<term>Pois</term>
<term>Pisum sativum</term>
<term>Energie</term>
<term>Digestibilité</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The nutritive value of four pea cultivars (AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma) and soybean meal (SBM) was evaluated in a 102 h study with 48 male White Pekin ducks. All birds were tube-fed 25 g of dextrose at 24 and 30 h after feed withdrawal, then 25 g of each feedstuff was tube-fed to eight ducks at 48 and 54 h after feed withdrawal. Excreta were quantitatively collected during the next 54 h. Endogenous nitrogen, amino acids and energy per bird in the 54 h collection period were 1.06 ± 0.58 g, 0.047 ± 0.025 g and 0.098 ± 0.049 MJ respectively. There were differences (P < 0.05) in apparent amino acid digestibilities (AAAD) and true amino acid digestibilities (TAAD). On average, AAAD were 82.8, 82.0, 70.3, 82.4 and 77.7% and TAAD were 89.4, 89.2, 82.3, 89.5 and 85.3% for SBM, AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma respectively. The nitrogen-corrected apparent and true metabolisable energy values did not differ among the pea diets and were 13.36 ± 0.071 and 14.59 ± 0.071 MJ kg<sup>-1</sup>
 respectively. Respective values for SBM were 12.16 ± 0.16 and 13.39 ± 0.16 MJ kg<sup>-1</sup>
 and both were lower (P < 0.05) than in peas.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0022-5142</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JSFAAE</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. sci. food agric.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>84</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>5</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Nutritional evaluation of peas for ducks</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>NYACHOTI (Charles M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>ONYANGO (Edward M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>OMOGBENIGUN (Olufemi F.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>ADEOLA (Olayiwola)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba</s1>
<s2>Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Animal Science, Purdue University</s1>
<s2>West Lafayette, IN 47907</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>474-480</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2004</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>2634</s2>
<s5>354000116684990140</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2004 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>33 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>04-0343075</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The nutritive value of four pea cultivars (AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma) and soybean meal (SBM) was evaluated in a 102 h study with 48 male White Pekin ducks. All birds were tube-fed 25 g of dextrose at 24 and 30 h after feed withdrawal, then 25 g of each feedstuff was tube-fed to eight ducks at 48 and 54 h after feed withdrawal. Excreta were quantitatively collected during the next 54 h. Endogenous nitrogen, amino acids and energy per bird in the 54 h collection period were 1.06 ± 0.58 g, 0.047 ± 0.025 g and 0.098 ± 0.049 MJ respectively. There were differences (P < 0.05) in apparent amino acid digestibilities (AAAD) and true amino acid digestibilities (TAAD). On average, AAAD were 82.8, 82.0, 70.3, 82.4 and 77.7% and TAAD were 89.4, 89.2, 82.3, 89.5 and 85.3% for SBM, AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma respectively. The nitrogen-corrected apparent and true metabolisable energy values did not differ among the pea diets and were 13.36 ± 0.071 and 14.59 ± 0.071 MJ kg<sup>-1</sup>
 respectively. Respective values for SBM were 12.16 ± 0.16 and 13.39 ± 0.16 MJ kg<sup>-1</sup>
 and both were lower (P < 0.05) than in peas.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A35A06</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002A16E</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Valeur nutritive</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nutritive value</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Valor nutritivo</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pois</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Pea</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Guisante</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pisum sativum</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Pisum sativum</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pisum sativum</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Energie</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Energy</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Energía</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Digestibilité</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Digestibility</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Digestibilidad</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Légume</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vegetables</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hortalizas</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Leguminosae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Leguminosae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Leguminosae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Légumineuse grain</s0>
<s5>49</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Grain legume</s0>
<s5>49</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Leguminosa grano</s0>
<s5>49</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>201</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 04-0343075 INIST</NO>
<ET>Nutritional evaluation of peas for ducks</ET>
<AU>NYACHOTI (Charles M.); ONYANGO (Edward M.); OMOGBENIGUN (Olufemi F.); ADEOLA (Olayiwola)</AU>
<AF>Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba/Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2/Canada (1 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Animal Science, Purdue University/West Lafayette, IN 47907/Etats-Unis (2 aut., 4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of the science of food and agriculture; ISSN 0022-5142; Coden JSFAAE; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2004; Vol. 84; No. 5; Pp. 474-480; Bibl. 33 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The nutritive value of four pea cultivars (AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma) and soybean meal (SBM) was evaluated in a 102 h study with 48 male White Pekin ducks. All birds were tube-fed 25 g of dextrose at 24 and 30 h after feed withdrawal, then 25 g of each feedstuff was tube-fed to eight ducks at 48 and 54 h after feed withdrawal. Excreta were quantitatively collected during the next 54 h. Endogenous nitrogen, amino acids and energy per bird in the 54 h collection period were 1.06 ± 0.58 g, 0.047 ± 0.025 g and 0.098 ± 0.049 MJ respectively. There were differences (P < 0.05) in apparent amino acid digestibilities (AAAD) and true amino acid digestibilities (TAAD). On average, AAAD were 82.8, 82.0, 70.3, 82.4 and 77.7% and TAAD were 89.4, 89.2, 82.3, 89.5 and 85.3% for SBM, AC Advantage, Carneval, CDC Mozart and Keoma respectively. The nitrogen-corrected apparent and true metabolisable energy values did not differ among the pea diets and were 13.36 ± 0.071 and 14.59 ± 0.071 MJ kg<sup>-1</sup>
 respectively. Respective values for SBM were 12.16 ± 0.16 and 13.39 ± 0.16 MJ kg<sup>-1</sup>
 and both were lower (P < 0.05) than in peas.</EA>
<CC>002A35A06; 002A16E</CC>
<FD>Valeur nutritive; Pois; Pisum sativum; Energie; Digestibilité</FD>
<FG>Légume; Leguminosae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Légumineuse grain</FG>
<ED>Nutritive value; Pea; Pisum sativum; Energy; Digestibility</ED>
<EG>Vegetables; Leguminosae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Grain legume</EG>
<SD>Valor nutritivo; Guisante; Pisum sativum; Energía; Digestibilidad</SD>
<LO>INIST-2634.354000116684990140</LO>
<ID>04-0343075</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MozartV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000187 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000187 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    MozartV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:04-0343075
   |texte=   Nutritional evaluation of peas for ducks
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.20.
Data generation: Sun Apr 10 15:06:14 2016. Site generation: Tue Feb 7 15:40:35 2023

	Serveur d'exploration sur Mozart
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur Mozart

Nutritional evaluation of peas for ducks

Nutritional evaluation of peas for ducks

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri